Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund vs Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund grades C while Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund grades A. Funding ratios: 64% vs 99%.

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 34.5 percentage points (98.6% vs 64.1%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

MetricPlumbers & Pipefitters National Pension FundLaborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
56/100 (C)99/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.1%98.6%*
Total Assets$21.0B$4.9B
Total Liabilities$32.8B$5.0B*
Unfunded Liability$11.8B$71.8M*
Participants430,00044,923
1-Year Investment Return5.5%*5.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorUnited Association (UA)LIUNA

Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 99/100 (A) compared to Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund at 56/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 34.5 percentage points (98.6% vs 64.1%). Laborers National (Industrial) Pension Fund covers 44,923 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons