Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund vs State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund grades A while State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) grades D. Funding ratios: 94% vs 40%.

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 53.7 percentage points (94.1% vs 40.4%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricTeamsters Local 710 Pension FundState Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*40/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*40.4%
Total Assets$55.6B$19.8B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$49.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$29.2B
Participants634,861152,000
1-Year Investment Return4.2%4.5%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorTeamsters Local 710State of Illinois

Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to State Employees Retirement System of Illinois (SERS) at 40/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 53.7 percentage points (94.1% vs 40.4%). Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons