Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) vs Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 78.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) | Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 83/100 (A)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 92.1%* | 78.1% |
| Total Assets | $57.0B | $56.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $61.9B* | $71.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $4.9B* | $15.7B |
| Participants | 378,000 | 228,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.8%* | 6.7% |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Tennessee | Boeing Company |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Boeing Company Employee Retirement Plan at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 78.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.