UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund (A) and Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 86% and 88% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (85.9% vs 87.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A)* | 82/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $41.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $5.1B |
| Participants | 365,494 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | Texas Cities |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (85.9% vs 87.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.