UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (85.9% vs 87.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.
| Metric | UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 93/100 (A)* | 82/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 85.9% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.0B* | $41.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $848.9M* | $5.1B |
| Participants | 365,494 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | UFCW International | Texas Cities |
UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 93/100 (A) compared to Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) at 82/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 1.9 percentage points (85.9% vs 87.8%). UFCW International Union Industry Pension Fund covers 365,494 participants.