Skip to main content
PensionRisk

University of California Retirement Plan vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

University of California Retirement Plan and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: University of California Retirement Plan grades B while State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D. Funding ratios: 84% vs 44%.

University of California Retirement Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 39.4 percentage points (83.5% vs 44.1%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.

MetricUniversity of California Retirement PlanState Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
78/100 (B)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
83.5%*44.1%
Total Assets$82.0B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$98.2B$51.0B*
Unfunded Liability$16.2B*$28.5B
Participants305,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return7.2%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorUniversity of CaliforniaState of Illinois

University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 39.4 percentage points (83.5% vs 44.1%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.

Explore More