Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Virginia Retirement System (VRS) (B) and Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 75% and 84% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Virginia Retirement System (VRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 75.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.

MetricVirginia Retirement System (VRS)Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
70/100 (B)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
75.1%83.8%*
Total Assets$87.0B$47.0B
Total Liabilities$115.8B$56.1B*
Unfunded Liability$28.8B$9.1B*
Participants740,000220,000
1-Year Investment Return6.0%6.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of VirginiaState of Missouri

Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Virginia Retirement System (VRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 8.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 75.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.

Explore More