Washington State Department of Retirement Systems vs General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.
| Metric | Washington State Department of Retirement Systems | General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 78/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 87.8%* | 80.1% |
| Total Assets | $108.0B | $66.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $123.0B | $83.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $15.0B* | $16.5B |
| Participants | 528,000 | 302,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.7% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | corporate |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Washington | General Motors |
Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan at 78/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 7.7 percentage points (87.8% vs 80.1%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.