Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A while Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) grades B. Funding ratios: 94% vs 72%.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 72.3%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustArizona State Retirement System (ASRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*68/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*72.3%
Total Assets$55.6B$46.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B*$63.6B
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$17.6B
Participants634,861588,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.8%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceState of Arizona

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 21.8 percentage points (94.1% vs 72.3%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More