Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust grades A while Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) grades B. Funding ratios: 94% vs 78%.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 78.2%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustIndiana Public Retirement System (INPRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*70/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*78.2%
Total Assets$55.6B$37.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$47.3B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$10.3B
Participants634,861425,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*6.1%
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceState of Indiana

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Indiana Public Retirement System (INPRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (94.1% vs 78.2%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More