Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 79.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.
| Metric | Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust | Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 79/100 (B)* | 71/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.9%* | 79.1% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $35.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $56.2B | $44.2B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $10.2B | $9.2B* |
| Participants | 590,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2%* | 5.9% |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Western Conference | State of Minnesota |
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 71/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.8 percentage points (81.9% vs 79.1%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 590,000 participants.