Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 84% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.8%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustMissouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*80/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*83.8%
Total Assets$55.6B$47.0B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$56.1B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$9.1B
Participants634,861220,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%6.3%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceState of Missouri

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 83.8%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More