Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust vs Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (A) and Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 83% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.5 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.6%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

MetricWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustSheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*91/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*82.6%
Total Assets$55.6B$7.5B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$9.1B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$1.6B*
Participants634,861148,965
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.3%
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorTeamsters Western ConferenceSheet Metal Workers International Association

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund at 91/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.5 percentage points (94.1% vs 82.6%). Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons