Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.0 percentage points (72.3% vs 72.3%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.
| Metric | Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 68/100 (B) | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.3% | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.6B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $17.6B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 588,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 5.9%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Arizona | State of Kansas |
Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.0 percentage points (72.3% vs 72.3%). Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) covers 588,000 participants.