New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (95.3% vs 72.3%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.
| Metric | New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) | Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 68/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 95.3%* | 72.3% |
| Total Assets | $248.0B | $24.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $260.2B | $34.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B | $9.5B* |
| Participants | 1,070,000 | 328,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.1%* | 5.9% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of New York | State of Kansas |
New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 23.0 percentage points (95.3% vs 72.3%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.