Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) vs International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) (B) and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 72% and 71% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.9 percentage points (71.4% vs 72.3%). International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust covers 729 participants.

MetricKansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
68/100 (B)79/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
72.3%*71.4%
Total Assets$24.8B$139.8M
Total Liabilities$34.3B$195.7M*
Unfunded Liability$9.5B$55.9M*
Participants328,000729
1-Year Investment Return5.9%*5.5%
Plan Typepublicmultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorState of KansasBoilermakers Union

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust has a stronger Pension Health Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.9 percentage points (71.4% vs 72.3%). International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust covers 729 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons