Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 71% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 71.4%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundInternational Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*79/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*71.4%
Total Assets$55.6B$139.8M
Total Liabilities$59.1B$195.7M*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B$55.9M*
Participants634,861729
1-Year Investment Return4.5%5.5%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levellowmoderate
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesBoilermakers Union

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to International Brotherhood of Boilermakers National Pension Trust at 79/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 22.6 percentage points (94.1% vs 71.4%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons