Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Bakery & Confectionery Union Industry International Pension Fund vs United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Bakery & Confectionery Union Industry International Pension Fund (D) and United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan (D) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 42% and 51% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 49/100 (D) compared to Bakery & Confectionery Union Industry International Pension Fund at 45/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 9.7 percentage points (51.5% vs 41.8%). United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan covers 73,913 participants.

MetricBakery & Confectionery Union Industry International Pension FundUnited Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
45/100 (D)49/100 (D)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
41.8%51.5%*
Total Assets$3.0B$3.3B
Total Liabilities$7.1B$6.5B*
Unfunded Liability$4.1B$3.1B*
Participants100,40273,913
1-Year Investment Return4.6%5.0%*
Plan Typemultiemployermultiemployer
PBGC Risk Levelcriticalhigh
SponsorBCTGM International UnionUMWA

United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 49/100 (D) compared to Bakery & Confectionery Union Industry International Pension Fund at 45/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 9.7 percentage points (51.5% vs 41.8%). United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan covers 73,913 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons