Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Washington State Department of Retirement Systems

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and Washington State Department of Retirement Systems are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) grades C while Washington State Department of Retirement Systems grades A. Funding ratios: 67% vs 88%.

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 20.5 percentage points (87.8% vs 67.3%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

MetricCalifornia Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS)Washington State Department of Retirement Systems
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
58/100 (C)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
67.3%87.8%*
Total Assets$473.0B$108.0B
Total Liabilities$703.0B$123.0B*
Unfunded Liability$230.0B$15.0B*
Participants2,050,000528,000
1-Year Investment Return5.8%6.7%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatelow
SponsorState of CaliforniaState of Washington

Washington State Department of Retirement Systems has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 20.5 percentage points (87.8% vs 67.3%). Washington State Department of Retirement Systems covers 528,000 participants.

Explore More