Skip to main content
PensionRisk

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) vs South Carolina Retirement System

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) and South Carolina Retirement System are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) grades B while South Carolina Retirement System grades C. Funding ratios: 73% vs 55%.

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.8 percentage points (72.9% vs 55.1%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.

MetricCalifornia State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS)South Carolina Retirement System
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
73/100 (B)*52/100 (C)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
72.9%*55.1%
Total Assets$318.0B$35.5B
Total Liabilities$436.0B$64.4B*
Unfunded Liability$118.0B$28.9B*
Participants985,000575,000
1-Year Investment Return6.2%*5.2%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatehigh
SponsorState of CaliforniaState of South Carolina

California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 73/100 (B) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.8 percentage points (72.9% vs 55.1%). California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) covers 985,000 participants.

Explore More