New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) vs South Carolina Retirement System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 40.2 percentage points (95.3% vs 55.1%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.
| Metric | New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) | South Carolina Retirement System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 82/100 (A)* | 52/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 95.3%* | 55.1% |
| Total Assets | $248.0B | $35.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $260.2B | $64.4B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $12.2B* | $28.9B |
| Participants | 1,070,000 | 575,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 7.1%* | 5.2% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | high |
| Sponsor | State of New York | State of South Carolina |
New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to South Carolina Retirement System at 52/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 40.2 percentage points (95.3% vs 55.1%). New York State & Local Retirement System (NYSLRS) covers 1,070,000 participants.