California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) vs Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) at 73/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 25.5 percentage points (98.4% vs 72.9%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 73/100 (B) | 86/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.9% | 98.4%* |
| Total Assets | $318.0B | $122.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $436.0B | $124.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $118.0B | $2.0B* |
| Participants | 985,000 | 665,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.2% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of California | State of Wisconsin |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) at 73/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 25.5 percentage points (98.4% vs 72.9%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.