California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) vs Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) grades C while Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 67% vs 98%.
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.
Verdict
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 31.1 percentage points (98.4% vs 67.3%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.
| Metric | California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) | Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 58/100 (C) | 86/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 67.3% | 98.4%* |
| Total Assets | $473.0B | $122.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $703.0B | $124.0B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $230.0B | $2.0B* |
| Participants | 2,050,000 | 665,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of California | State of Wisconsin |
Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 86/100 (A) compared to California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) at 58/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 31.1 percentage points (98.4% vs 67.3%). Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) covers 665,000 participants.