Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Chicago Teachers Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Chicago Teachers Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund grades A while Chicago Teachers Pension Fund grades D. Funding ratios: 94% vs 43%.

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Chicago Teachers Pension Fund at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 51.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 42.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

MetricCentral States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundChicago Teachers Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
94.1%*42.8%
Total Assets$55.6B$12.4B
Total Liabilities$59.1B$29.0B*
Unfunded Liability$3.5B*$16.6B
Participants634,86169,000
1-Year Investment Return4.5%4.6%*
Plan Typemultiemployerpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorTeamsters Central StatesCity of Chicago

Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Chicago Teachers Pension Fund at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 51.3 percentage points (94.1% vs 42.8%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons