Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 66/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 48.1 percentage points (70.1% vs 22.0%). Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) covers 327,000 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 29/100 (F) | 66/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 22.0% | 70.1%* |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $31.5B |
| Total Liabilities | $43.2B* | $44.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $33.7B | $13.4B* |
| Participants | 380,000 | 327,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 5.5%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Texas |
Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 66/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 48.1 percentage points (70.1% vs 22.0%). Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) covers 327,000 participants.