Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 54.8 percentage points (76.8% vs 22.0%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 29/100 (F) | 71/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 22.0% | 76.8%* |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $77.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $43.2B* | $100.5B |
| Unfunded Liability | $33.7B | $23.3B* |
| Participants | 380,000 | 370,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 5.6%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | New York City |
NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 54.8 percentage points (76.8% vs 22.0%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.