Skip to main content
PensionRisk

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) vs NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) (B) and NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 77% and 74% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.6 percentage points (76.8% vs 74.2%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

MetricNYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS)NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
71/100 (B)*68/100 (B)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
76.8%*74.2%
Total Assets$77.2B$92.0B
Total Liabilities$100.5B*$124.0B
Unfunded Liability$23.3B*$32.0B
Participants370,000225,000
1-Year Investment Return5.6%*5.4%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorNew York CityNew York City

NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 2.6 percentage points (76.8% vs 74.2%). NYC Employees Retirement System (NYCERS) covers 370,000 participants.

Explore More