Skip to main content
PensionRisk

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs NYC Police Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) and NYC Police Pension Fund (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 74% and 78% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

NYC Police Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.1 percentage points (78.3% vs 74.2%). NYC Police Pension Fund covers 60,000 participants.

MetricNYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS)NYC Police Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
68/100 (B)71/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
74.2%78.3%*
Total Assets$92.0B$49.0B
Total Liabilities$124.0B$62.6B*
Unfunded Liability$32.0B$13.6B*
Participants225,00060,000
1-Year Investment Return5.4%5.8%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatemoderate
SponsorNew York CityNew York City

NYC Police Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 68/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 4.1 percentage points (78.3% vs 74.2%). NYC Police Pension Fund covers 60,000 participants.

Explore More

NYC Teachers Retirement System (TRS) full profile|NYC Police Pension Fund full profile

Related Comparisons