Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund (A) and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 92% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 92.1%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 97/100 (A)* | 83/100 (A) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 94.1%* | 92.1% |
| Total Assets | $55.6B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $59.1B* | $61.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $3.5B* | $4.9B |
| Participants | 634,861 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Tennessee |
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund has a stronger Pension Health Score of 97/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 2.0 percentage points (94.1% vs 92.1%). Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund covers 634,861 participants.