Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 70.1 percentage points (92.1% vs 22.0%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 29/100 (F) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 22.0% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $43.2B* | $61.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $33.7B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 380,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 70.1 percentage points (92.1% vs 22.0%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.