Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) vs International Paper Company Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) and International Paper Company Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 92% and 104% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.9 percentage points (104.0% vs 92.1%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

MetricTennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)International Paper Company Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
83/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
92.1%104.0%*
Total Assets$57.0B$8.8B
Total Liabilities$61.9B$8.5B*
Unfunded Liability$4.9B$0*
Participants378,00083,689
1-Year Investment Return6.8%7.0%*
Plan Typepubliccorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of TennesseeInternational Paper

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) at 83/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 11.9 percentage points (104.0% vs 92.1%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons