Skip to main content
PensionRisk

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan vs International Paper Company Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

AT&T Pension Benefit Plan (A) and International Paper Company Retirement Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 94% and 104% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (104.0% vs 93.7%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

MetricAT&T Pension Benefit PlanInternational Paper Company Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
97/100 (A)100/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
93.7%104.0%*
Total Assets$30.0B$8.8B
Total Liabilities$32.0B$8.5B*
Unfunded Liability$2.0B$0*
Participants286,35583,689
1-Year Investment Return6.9%7.0%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorAT&T Inc.International Paper

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to AT&T Pension Benefit Plan at 97/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.3 percentage points (104.0% vs 93.7%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons