Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund vs Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 65.8 percentage points (87.8% vs 22.0%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.
| Metric | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund | Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 29/100 (F) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 22.0% | 87.8%* |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $36.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $43.2B | $41.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $33.7B | $5.1B* |
| Participants | 380,000 | 218,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.5% | 6.3%* |
| Plan Type | multiemployer | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | low |
| Sponsor | Teamsters Central States | Texas Cities |
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund at 29/100 (F). Funding ratios differ by 65.8 percentage points (87.8% vs 22.0%). Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) covers 218,000 participants.