Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs Denver Employees Retirement Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) (C) and Denver Employees Retirement Plan (B) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 65% and 79% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

Denver Employees Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.4 percentage points (79.2% vs 64.8%). Denver Employees Retirement Plan covers 21,000 participants.

MetricColorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)Denver Employees Retirement Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)71/100 (B)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.8%79.2%*
Total Assets$58.0B$4.8B
Total Liabilities$89.5B$6.1B*
Unfunded Liability$31.5B$1.3B*
Participants625,00021,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.1%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighmoderate
SponsorState of ColoradoCity of Denver

Denver Employees Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 71/100 (B) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 14.4 percentage points (79.2% vs 64.8%). Denver Employees Retirement Plan covers 21,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons