Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) vs State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) (C) and State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 65% and 80% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.4 percentage points (80.2% vs 64.8%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.

MetricColorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA)State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
61/100 (C)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
64.8%80.2%*
Total Assets$58.0B$90.0B
Total Liabilities$89.5B*$112.2B
Unfunded Liability$31.5B$22.2B*
Participants625,000507,000
1-Year Investment Return5.5%6.0%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of ColoradoState of Ohio

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Colorado Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) at 61/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 15.4 percentage points (80.2% vs 64.8%). State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio (STRS Ohio) covers 507,000 participants.

Explore More