Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Deere & Company Pension Plan vs Chicago Teachers Pension Fund

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Deere & Company Pension Plan and Chicago Teachers Pension Fund are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Deere & Company Pension Plan grades A while Chicago Teachers Pension Fund grades D. Funding ratios: 124% vs 43%.

Deere & Company Pension Plan comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Chicago Teachers Pension Fund at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 81.2 percentage points (124.0% vs 42.8%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

MetricDeere & Company Pension PlanChicago Teachers Pension Fund
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)*44/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
124.0%*42.8%
Total Assets$21.1B$12.4B
Total Liabilities$17.0B*$29.0B
Unfunded Liability$0*$16.6B
Participants83,07669,000
1-Year Investment Return7.4%*4.6%
Plan Typecorporatepublic
PBGC Risk Levellowcritical
SponsorJohn DeereCity of Chicago

Deere & Company Pension Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Chicago Teachers Pension Fund at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 81.2 percentage points (124.0% vs 42.8%). Deere & Company Pension Plan covers 83,076 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons