Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Florida Retirement System (FRS) vs New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Florida Retirement System (FRS) (B) and New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 82% and 97% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.9 percentage points (97.1% vs 82.2%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

MetricFlorida Retirement System (FRS)New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
76/100 (B)82/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
82.2%97.1%*
Total Assets$190.0B$131.0B
Total Liabilities$231.1B$134.9B*
Unfunded Liability$41.1B$3.9B*
Participants1,065,000433,000
1-Year Investment Return6.5%6.8%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorState of FloridaState of New York

New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.9 percentage points (97.1% vs 82.2%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.

Explore More