Florida Retirement System (FRS) vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 9.9 percentage points (92.1% vs 82.2%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Florida Retirement System (FRS) | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 76/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 82.2% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $190.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $231.1B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $41.1B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 1,065,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.5% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Florida | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Florida Retirement System (FRS) at 76/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 9.9 percentage points (92.1% vs 82.2%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.