Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) and Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 77% and 60% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.3 percentage points (77.4% vs 60.1%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.
| Metric | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B)* | 54/100 (C) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.4%* | 60.1% |
| Total Assets | $74.0B | $29.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $95.6B | $48.3B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $21.6B | $19.3B* |
| Participants | 405,000 | 322,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.3% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | high |
| Sponsor | State of Georgia | State of Mississippi |
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) at 54/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 17.3 percentage points (77.4% vs 60.1%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.