Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 77.4%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.
| Metric | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B) | 72/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.4%* | 77.3% |
| Total Assets | $74.0B | $84.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $95.6B* | $108.7B |
| Unfunded Liability | $21.6B* | $24.7B |
| Participants | 405,000 | 375,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0%* | 5.7% |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Georgia | State of Oregon |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 72/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 0.1 percentage points (77.3% vs 77.4%). Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) covers 375,000 participants.