Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) (B) and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 77% and 92% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.7 percentage points (92.1% vs 77.4%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.4% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $74.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $95.6B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $21.6B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 405,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Georgia | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 14.7 percentage points (92.1% vs 77.4%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.