Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs University of California Retirement Plan
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.1 percentage points (83.5% vs 77.4%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.
| Metric | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | University of California Retirement Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 70/100 (B) | 78/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 77.4% | 83.5%* |
| Total Assets | $74.0B | $82.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $95.6B* | $98.2B |
| Unfunded Liability | $21.6B | $16.2B* |
| Participants | 405,000 | 305,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 6.0% | 7.2%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Georgia | University of California |
University of California Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 78/100 (B) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 6.1 percentage points (83.5% vs 77.4%). University of California Retirement Plan covers 305,000 participants.