Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (81.2% vs 77.4%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A)* | 70/100 (B) |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2%* | 77.4% |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B* | $95.6B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B* | $21.6B |
| Participants | 438,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.0%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Georgia |
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 70/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 3.8 percentage points (81.2% vs 77.4%). Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) covers 438,000 participants.