Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (97.1% vs 81.2%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 82/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2% | 97.1%* |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $131.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B* | $134.9B |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B | $3.9B* |
| Participants | 438,000 | 433,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of New York |
New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 82/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 15.9 percentage points (97.1% vs 81.2%). New York State Teachers Retirement System (NYSTRS) covers 433,000 participants.