Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) (A) and Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 81% and 92% respectively — within a few points of each other.
With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.9 percentage points (92.1% vs 81.2%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 80/100 (A) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 81.2% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $51.2B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $63.1B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $11.9B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 438,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | low | low |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) at 80/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 10.9 percentage points (92.1% vs 81.2%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.