Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 32.7 percentage points (77.4% vs 44.7%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D) | 70/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7% | 77.4%* |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $74.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $95.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $21.6B* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 405,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 6.0%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Georgia |
Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 70/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 32.7 percentage points (77.4% vs 44.7%). Georgia Teachers Retirement System (TRS) covers 405,000 participants.