Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) vs Maryland State Retirement & Pension System
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.4 percentage points (72.1% vs 44.7%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.
| Metric | Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 44/100 (D) | 67/100 (B)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 44.7% | 72.1%* |
| Total Assets | $62.8B | $61.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $140.5B | $84.6B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $77.7B | $23.6B* |
| Participants | 424,000 | 398,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 4.8% | 5.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | critical | moderate |
| Sponsor | State of Illinois | State of Maryland |
Maryland State Retirement & Pension System has a stronger Pension Health Score of 67/100 (B) compared to Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS) at 44/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 27.4 percentage points (72.1% vs 44.7%). Maryland State Retirement & Pension System covers 398,000 participants.