Skip to main content
PensionRisk

International Paper Company Retirement Plan vs Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

International Paper Company Retirement Plan (A) and Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan (A) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 104% and 124% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (104.0% vs 124.0%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

MetricInternational Paper Company Retirement PlanJohnson & Johnson Pension Plan
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
104.0%124.0%*
Total Assets$8.8B$21.1B
Total Liabilities$8.5B*$17.0B
Unfunded Liability$0$0
Participants83,68983,076
1-Year Investment Return7.0%7.5%*
Plan Typecorporatecorporate
PBGC Risk Levellowlow
SponsorInternational PaperJohnson & Johnson

International Paper Company Retirement Plan has a stronger Pension Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Johnson & Johnson Pension Plan at 100/100 (A). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (104.0% vs 124.0%). International Paper Company Retirement Plan covers 83,689 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons