Skip to main content
PensionRisk

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) vs State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) and State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) grades B while State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) grades D. Funding ratios: 72% vs 44%.

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.1%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.

MetricKansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS)State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
68/100 (B)*42/100 (D)
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
72.3%*44.1%
Total Assets$24.8B$22.5B
Total Liabilities$34.3B*$51.0B
Unfunded Liability$9.5B*$28.5B
Participants328,000218,000
1-Year Investment Return5.9%*5.1%
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelmoderatecritical
SponsorState of KansasState of Illinois

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 68/100 (B) compared to State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS) at 42/100 (D). Funding ratios differ by 28.2 percentage points (72.3% vs 44.1%). Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) covers 328,000 participants.

Explore More