Maryland State Retirement & Pension System vs Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS)
Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data
Verdict
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 72.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.
| Metric | Maryland State Retirement & Pension System | Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk | 67/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Funding Ratio Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded) | 72.1% | 92.1%* |
| Total Assets | $61.0B | $57.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $84.6B | $61.9B* |
| Unfunded Liability | $23.6B | $4.9B* |
| Participants | 398,000 | 378,000 |
| 1-Year Investment Return | 5.8% | 6.8%* |
| Plan Type | public | public |
| PBGC Risk Level | moderate | low |
| Sponsor | State of Maryland | State of Tennessee |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Maryland State Retirement & Pension System at 67/100 (B). Funding ratios differ by 20.0 percentage points (92.1% vs 72.1%). Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) covers 378,000 participants.