Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) vs Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) and Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) are meaningfully apart on the LakeQuality pension-health rubric: New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) grades C while Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) grades A. Funding ratios: 48% vs 84%.

Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) comes out ahead on the composite rubric. For a participant in either plan, the spread is informative but not directly actionable — pension participation is not portable, so the relevant question is what each plan's funded-status trajectory means for that participant's benefit security.

Verdict

Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 48.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.

MetricNew Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
51/100 (C)80/100 (A)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
48.1%83.8%*
Total Assets$28.5B$47.0B
Total Liabilities$59.3B$56.1B*
Unfunded Liability$30.8B$9.1B*
Participants268,000220,000
1-Year Investment Return4.9%6.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighlow
SponsorState of New JerseyState of Missouri

Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 80/100 (A) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 35.7 percentage points (83.8% vs 48.1%). Missouri Public School Retirement System (PSRS) covers 220,000 participants.

Explore More