Skip to main content
PensionRisk

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) vs New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS)

Side-by-side pension health comparison from DOL and public plan data

New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) (C) and New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) (C) are close on the LakeQuality rubric. Funding ratios sit at 48% and 58% respectively — within a few points of each other.

With grades this close, the comparison turns on plan-specific factors: status (active vs frozen), participant maturity, sponsor financial health, and multi-year trajectory rather than the headline composite.

Verdict

New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 55/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.0 percentage points (58.1% vs 48.1%). New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) covers 88,000 participants.

MetricNew Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF)New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS)
Health Score
Composite of funding ratio, trend, and PBGC risk
51/100 (C)55/100 (C)*
Funding Ratio
Assets as % of liabilities (100%+ is fully funded)
48.1%58.1%*
Total Assets$28.5B$30.0B
Total Liabilities$59.3B$51.6B*
Unfunded Liability$30.8B$21.6B*
Participants268,00088,000
1-Year Investment Return4.9%5.3%*
Plan Typepublicpublic
PBGC Risk Levelhighhigh
SponsorState of New JerseyState of New Jersey

New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) has a stronger Pension Health Score of 55/100 (C) compared to New Jersey Teachers Pension & Annuity Fund (TPAF) at 51/100 (C). Funding ratios differ by 10.0 percentage points (58.1% vs 48.1%). New Jersey Police & Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) covers 88,000 participants.

Explore More

Related Comparisons